Moscow needs to deploy medium- and short-range missiles in other parts of the world and Cuba is on the listThis was said by Konstantin Kosachev, deputy chairman of the Russian Federation Council, who joined the words of several senior Kremlin officials calling for a new cold war with the US and the West without fear.
In the reports Half Russian SVKosachev said that lifting the temporary ban on the INF Treaty (Treaty on Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces) would be an appropriate response to increasing US missile capabilities in Japan.
Last February, Moscow announced it was suspending the 1987 accord signed by Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev, and proposed that both nuclear powers abandon all nuclear and conventional ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges of 500 to 5,500 kilometers. .
Russia withdrew from the INF in 2018 following Donald Trump’s announcement that the United States would withdraw from the treaty. It was discontinued in February 2019. Russia did so the next day. Similarly, monitoring reports from Washington warned in 2014 that Russia was violating its INF Treaty obligations.
According to Kosachev, the current international situation poses a threat to Russia’s national security, the same argument as Vladimir Putin’s military expansion and invasion of Ukraine.
just before, Vladimir YermakovThe director of the Russian Foreign Ministry’s Department of Non-Proliferation and Arms Control said Moscow may adhere to the ban on short-range and intermediate-range ground-based deployments because of US actions. Missiles.
According to him, the “destabilizing military programs of the United States and its allies” make the embargo “increasingly fragile.”
Ermakov pointed out Moscow will assess the speed and range of US-made missile systems that may appear in the Asia-Pacific regionIncluding the territory of Japan.
“In particular, Russia’s willingness to continue to maintain a unilateral ban on the deployment of intermediate-range and short-range land-based missiles in certain regions will be based on specific parameters of their range,” he explained.
In an interview he gave to a Russian media outlet, Alexander BerendshevPlekhanov is an associate professor at the Department of Political Analysis and Social Psychological Processes at the Russian University of Economics. “Deployment of short- and medium-range missiles abroad is a very expensive process. So we’re only spending money on actually acting, not just threatening.”
When asked if Latin America would be a target for these weapons, he referred to the so-called missile crisis of 1962, after the Soviet Union stationed nuclear weapons in Cuba.
“In 1962 we deployed medium-range missiles in Cuba, which caused the Cuban Missile Crisis. However, it was this action by the Soviet Union that led the United States to realize the reality of its country’s destruction. The understanding that there would be no winners in a nuclear war. It was only after the Cuban Missile Crisis that the US became more accommodating.This led to the signing of the ABM Treaty of 1972 and the Helsinki Accords of 1975″.
“Today, it is unlikely that missiles will be stationed in Cuba and Venezuela. It is too expensive and not entirely reliable. But the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is completely different. Strengthen the Pacific borders with China in securing the Northern Sea Route and the Arctic. and for possible assistance to Beijing in its confrontation with Washington and Tokyo. “It is not for nothing that naval exercises are regularly held in this area,” Berendsheev noted.
“I remind you that the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, Dmitry Medvedev has already talked about deploying Russian weapons in North Korea in response to hostile actions by South Korea, Japan and the United States. “It’s a response to America’s build-up of missile capabilities in Japan,” he noted.
Regarding the already confirmed deployment of Russian tactical missiles in Belarus, which actively participated in the invasion of Ukraine, Berendzhiev said: “Russia and Belarus have military and geopolitical needs linked together, as well as security and defense issues. At a time when the State of the Union, the West, has decided to use depleted uranium bombs, our geopolitical relationship with Political conflict is increasingly merging with the sphere of military conflict.”
your side Igor ShatrovThe head of the expert group of the Russian Strategic Development Fund emphasized: “If the West cannot be persuaded by words, there is only one thing left: to compel right behavior by actions.”
“Recent events suggest that Russia has moved from words to actions. The deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus is an example. I have no doubt that the enemy is not paying attention if there is a situation that actually threatens Russia’s security. Our deterrence measures will deploy the Kremlin’s intermediate and short-range missiles abroad,” he said. He said.
“Objectively, the appearance of American nuclear weapons in Poland, if it happens, will force Russia to deploy similar means of destruction in Belarus. Of course, strategic nuclear weapons do not necessarily appear on the territory of Belarus, but nuclear weapons can provide a wide range of weapons tactics there”.
Faced with the question of where else to station Russian nuclear weapons, Shatrov did not rule out Cuba. According to him, such a decision “will be a threat to Russia. If it comes from Japan or South Korea, Moscow has secret agreements with Pyongyang.”
“The DPRK has nuclear weapons, so it does not perceive the deployment of additional weapons in its territory as a threat, but rather as a strengthening of its own defense capabilities. Russia can arm Iskander missiles and hypersonic daggers. Nuclear weapons. A full range of cruise missiles can be delivered in a nuclear design,” He said.
last week, Sergey LavrovThe Kremlin’s foreign minister visited Brazil, Venezuela, Nicaragua and Cuba. In Havana, he did not deny that Russia plans to establish a new military base on the island.
According to the Russian agency Interfax, when asked about this, the Moscow official commented that “military cooperation with Cuba is developing successfully in accordance with the agreements of both parties, and as I understand it, the parties are satisfied.” These forms of cooperation are both Russian and Cuban.
Rumors of the Kremlin using Cuba as a base to pressure the United States have run rampant in recent days.After the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) reaffirmed its support for Ukraine in the face of Russia’s invasion, the alliance’s secretary general paid a flying visit to Kiev.
In the same week, retired Colonel Victor Barnets, an influential columnist for the daily Komsomolskaya PravdaHe assured that Russia has more than one option for Ukraine’s integration with NATO.
“There are many options. Returning a military base to Cuba, for example. Missiles take only seven minutes to fly from Kharkiv to Moscow… And the new Russian Zircon hypersonic missile flies at a speed of 11,000 kilometers per hour. And the distance from Cuba to the United States is only 180 kilometers.”He warned.
“And most importantly: NATO needs to play Moscow on a ground that is ‘uncomfortable’ for Russians and foreigners, very familiar (yes, practically ‘home’!) to Americans and Western Europeans. Is NATO sure it wants to?” he said.